What Business Is It of Yours? : UPDATE

September 4th, 2010

Today at the corner of Sanayeh Gardens, I saw a familiar figure leaning against the wall in a way that triggered my memory: His left leg slightly bent, his foot pressed up behind him. I almost passed him when I suddenly stopped and turned to him.

“Were you the one who saved me from the walrus taxi driver who wanted to slap me in the middle of the street?” I asked.

He hardly hesitated, “Yes!”

“Oh my gosh, thank you!” I proceeded to give him a hug (a natural inclination).

He laughed, we laughed.

“Thank you so much! You saved me! You were like an angel!”

“That guy came back and gave me trouble at work…”

I raised an eyebrow.

“After one hour, he came back, got out of his car, and asked me, ‘What is it your business to get involved… she swore at me! She deserves to be beaten!’”

Here he looked at me and said, “I’m Sudani, we don’t let a girl get hurt in front of us. Moustaheel.” And so he told walrus, who was having none of it.

“Inta, it’s none of your business! I’m gonna get the police and have you arrested!”

And evidently, his employers at the pharmacy felt the same way. Why did you get involved? They had asked. What business is it of yours?

Again, it was reassuring to know that my countrymen are so freaking protective of each other – from the taxi driver to the pharmacy owner… (see if I ever buy another deoderant from him)…

Remembering

August 20th, 2010

It is always surreal to me to think that I’ve walked on pavement in Lebanon where a person was murdered, left to bleed, rotted, covered his face from a bullet. It’s common for me to walk down the street, ride in a taxi or walk by someone sitting watching all corners on a ragged street chair, and wonder if these faces watched someone die by their hands. It’s disconcerting to hear war stories from a friend or acquaintance, over dinner or a walk, in between ice cream licks or chatter about this boy or that unforgettable trip to Tyr. They may tell me that a bullet came through this window or that, or a rocket burned their house down. Or that their art is, surprisingly, filled with war memories. It’s always fascinating to hear my grandfather’s stories about when he alone stayed behind in the village during the civil war to save his furniture, then making friends with the invaders. Then just surviving the rocket that entered his house – because he chose to sleep in the family room rather than his bedroom.  It’s normal to forget about the still standing, hallowed out buildings; it wouldn’t be Lebanon without them. It’s finally that we can drive on the highways that have been rebuilt after their destruction during the July 2006 war. It’s mathematical; I realize that my students were born in the year that I first visited Lebanon. My counterparts were mostly little kids running to the basement for safety in the ‘80s. My little cousins’ memories of war exist only the blood they’ve inherited. It’s surreal. I live in Hamra, where a community regularly circles the same art openings, plays, cafes, parties. We regularly see the sun rise above the rims of our cups. We meet people from all over the world who have come to Lebanon to mill through their exotic fantasies, the history, the night.  Yet, those who call this place home prepare for a violent past to come for a visit.  And it’s very real that people hear their footsteps on the pavement a little more loudly, as a result. This is what this piece made me think about.

“The Safety of Objects” in Jadaliyya

Thousands of Miles Away from Home

July 20th, 2010

Me, my sister (aka: Kool Moe Dee), and my dad. Somewhere in Lebanon. July, 1992.

In 1992, when I was thirteen, I landed in Lebanon for the first time I can remember (there were two other times at 1 y/o and 4 y/o, which I only can see in pictures, like the one of me riding on my grandpa’s back at just a year old with an unlit cigarette squeezed between my teeth). As most of the passengers on the plane that June, it had been the first time my parents had been to Lebanon in 9 years, due to the heavy fighting and instability of the civil war.  As the babies’ air-pressure screams subsided, applause filled the plane as tears trickled down the sides of passengers’ faces. I looked down from the plane window and noticed the square white houses. Two words swept across my mind: I’m home.

That trip was so many things to me at the time. I had not wanted to go at all. I would be entering high school that fall, and had been a professional rejector of many Lebanese “policies.” It was these policies – of censor, propriety, standards – that stood as stones piled high against the more liberal American “policies” that I was interested in. These stones were held firmly with my parents’ favorite phrase (which they no longer say): “You don’t need to be like the Americans.”

So here I was, being dragged – for the whole summer – to a place that was not only the originator of my non-liberties, but also a place that had fought itself for 15 years.

And somehow, the plane’s wheels touched the runway, and my head said, I’m home.

1992 was the time before satellite television spilled out the open windows of everyone’s village home, and I was part of the first wave of the diaspora to “come back” after the war; in other words, my siblings and I, the Amerkaan, were somewhat of a spectacle. Walking through the village provoked unapologetic staring (can you see curious old skirted women on their porches?) – it’s not like we looked so different, besides our smooth-lined American clothes. I learned that people were not necessarily interested in who we were (besides what family we were from); instead, questions seemed to derive from a curiosity about how we saw Lebanon – and what was it like b’Amerka? Which is better, here or there? Do you have this kind of traffic there? Do you eat mlukhiyeh there? Would you ever live in Lebanon? (I never had thought the answer to the latter would one day be yes…).

We were welcomed immediately.  Everyone was so kind, polite, and generous, to the point that I couldn’t believe that anything else was acceptable in the world. My grandparents spoiled us (I thought: so this is what it’s like to have grandparents!). Everything that I ate tasted like it was glazed with heaven-love (Why are the eggs so good? The cherries? Nescafe?). My Arabic was atrocious, yet everyone poked me to tell them stories so that they could get a kick out of my slaughtering of the language. Daily, my young aunt and I would walk by the church where at dusk we would meet other teenagers in the village, who were there to socialize or fall in love. I made friends, which I still have today. The air, the trees, the sea, the souk, the streets, the smells… all of it was intoxicating, shocking, and splendid.

After that year, my family and I would go every other year. And I anticipated it.  Those visits to Lebanon had helped fill the gap between my parents and us. I became more proud of my heritage. They more boldly outlined my identity so that I could more boldly outline my beliefs. My second language took on new dimensions. I learned what it was like to fall in love with a place. Until one day, at 28, I moved there.

Now, during the summers, when I am in Illinois at my parents’, as I am now, I witness others’ anticipation upon leaving, and their stories upon returning. The first round of family friends has arrived back from Lebanon. They are bronzed, jetlagged. They tell about the slovenly butcher and his truck full of dead meat; their American relatives who flip-flopped around the village with Almazas in hands; their wild nights at Skybar and in Gemmayze. They are edged with excitement, a sudden fatigue, a hesitant return to reality.

In five days, I will once again return to Lebanon. I am reminded of what my friend once said: “I can’t wait to leave Lebanon, just so I can come back. Isn’t that sick?” We had been talking about that feeling, that indescribably good feeling, of flying over Lebanon, as the plane takes its angle, and looking down at the coast of the country jutting into the engulfing gray sea and at the square white houses below.

Over Lebanon.

In Praise of Gettin’ Political

June 29th, 2010

Art project by 10 y/o Palestinian student in Shatila camp. The accompanying text reads: "This is a girl and all around her is blood. It's falling because she was hit by a bullet. She is from Palestine."

My dad doesn’t like me talking about politics online, but sometimes things are beyond evading for fear of some “bad guy” spying my itty bitty blog! Sorry, baba! The recent events of the Israeli flotilla raid is something we all should be talking about, writing about, seriously thinking about in terms of the future. And not just those of us in the region; actually, especially not only those in this region, but those who are paying for the crimes against humanity in Gaza and the occupied territories, with their tax dollars — the “conservative” figure being 114 billion dollars since 1948. That’s us, Americans.

Last week, about a month after the flotilla incidents, I sat in my friend’s condo in Oak Park, the Chicago neighborhood which was home to Frank Lloyd Wright and Ernest Hemingway. I asked him if he had heard anything about the flotilla raid; I wanted to know his thoughts. He’s a hardcore liberal, but also one to be fair. And he’s surely not one to believe in the disappearance of Israel; but he’s sure that the oppression of the Palestinians is appalling. “I heard something… but it wasn’t really covered here,” he told me. This echoed another news-conscientious friend’s question, “What are you talking about?” in response to a Facebook comment I made at the time of the raid: “When will THEY be known as terrorists?”

The raid dominated news in the Middle East and papers across Europe – and Facebook walls and television interviews across the world. However, not even one of my American friends posted anything on Facebook in regard to the raid while this was the contrary for my Middle East friends’ wall pages. In the U.S., as far as I can see, the only person still talking about this issue in a meaningful way is Charlie Rose, having hosted Joe Biden, Tony Blair, Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal, and most recently the Prime Minister of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on his show. But Charlie Rose is not “mainstream”; what is mainstream can only talk about the other side being “terrorists,” and today the easy label for that is “Hamas” – which is certainly not representative of all the Gazans.

My Chicago friend, on her village in Gaza, after 10 years of leaving:

When I go back, I cover up. But, I don’t care, they can wrap me in foil! But I can’t say what I want! Because if I do, the next thing you know I become a prostitute or I cheated on my husband. I cannot be who I want to be there. When I go back, I feel like I’m going back to Iran, I cannot take it – not as long as Hamas is there… but, at least I have amazing memories.

But the flotilla incident was not about Hamas. This was a fleet of ships coming from Turkey, an Israeli ally, filled with tons of aid, literally TONS of aid, to Gaza, including building materials which, among many other items, are denied to Gazans by the Israelis. To say that Israel has a right to their security, and therefore to raid the flotilla and kill 9 innocent activists on board because Hamas launched 3,000 rockets into Israel last year (see Biden interview) is not only sustaining Israel’s narrative which too often highlights its “right to defend itself” (esp. when being criticized for brutal and disproportionate force against their enemies) but also clearly avoiding the real issues – the attack occurred in international waters, 9 (unarmed) people were shot a total of 30 times, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the slow genocide of a people. The flotilla came with a humanitarian cause, not a terrorist one. And who are we as Americans if we continue to be dispassionate about a humanitarian crisis that our government maintains with political “correctness” and billions of dollars? And know, this humanitarian crisis is much closer to home than it seems.

I couldn’t be upset with my friend that he hadn’t investigated further when he had only heard “something” about it. I had been the same only a few years ago – before I came to the Middle East and sat with Palestinian activists from around the world; before I heard the stories of Palestinians who worked the same jobs as their Lebanese counterparts but were paid half; before I walked the filthy potholed streets of a Palestinian camp where children’s nighttime dreams are finger-painted into nightmarish images; before I met people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, ages, and religions who make daily decisions based on their belief in the rights and justice for Palestinians; before my family name became relevant; before living in a land that suffered murder and conflict with the Palestinians during the civil war, but could still have sympathy and empathy for and with them; before I lived in a region whose major problems lie in the Palestinian/Israeli issue. Before all of this, I saw Palestine/Israel most simply as the never-ending problem that the American government needed to find a solution for, but whose major problem was the terrorist elements and lack of “agreement.”

And I feel ashamed for not having dug deeper.

South Lebanon. Palestine/Israel in the distance.

Here are a few links to deeper/further/other perspectives on news coverage on Palestine/Israel:

http://electronicintifada.net/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middleeast/roundup

http://english.pnn.ps/

http://www.politicaltheatrics.net/

http://palestinechronicle.com/

http://www.world-newspapers.com/palestine.html

In the news today:

New York Times: “Israeli Rules Out Palestinian State by 2012

The Guardian: “Palestinian boycott of Israeli settlement goods starts to bite

Electronic Intifada: “PA Undermines UN Probe

The Jeruselum Post: “50% of Israelis Blame IHH

Haaretz: “Judge leading Gaza flotilla probe threatens to quit unless granted wider powers

“We Are All for the Nation”

June 14th, 2010

As the World Cup is underway, black, red, and yellow stripe the streets of Beirut as German flags wave in the center of intersections, from balconies, and out of car windows (often from all four). Their reproductions flip-flop underneath rearview mirrors and wrap snugly around Lebanese wrists. I asked a German acquaintance who was visiting Beirut if Berlin looked the same, rippling with flags. He sounded startled: “I haven’t seen any flags in Berlin for the Cup… Germans are too proud to raise flags.”

While we in Lebanon aren’t too proud, we have funny allegiances. As a taxi driver said recently, as we passed under a German flag that stretched from one side of the street to the other,  “If only the Lebanese loved their country as much…”

Here is some explanation for the Germans’ hesitation to raise their flags in their country. I found this some time after this post:  “German World Cup Patriotism Still Touchy Issue

Here is a recent analysis of the World Cup craze in Lebanon at the Beirut based blog The Long Slumber.

Joining the World?

May 28th, 2010

I haven’t blogged in awhile because I wrote a critical response to a one-man contemporary dance show, which then turned into an interrogatory commentary on the state of art in Beirut. And I pined… do I have a right to write this? Who am I to complain about a famous flamenco dancer who came to Beirut, who raised the audience off their feet for what I thought were superficial or obscure reasons? And I answered this question with more questions about art and its purpose: shouldn’t artists be more concerned about communicating to their audience? And though it may have been slightly thought-provoking (maybe to no one but myself and a friend who told me so), I started feeling self-conscious and invalid about my writing about art, and art it in Beirut, no less. This hesitation is dangerous, I know. It implies that an “outsider” cannot see things clearly, or meaningfully. Or that an individual’s perception of her environment is inferior to the general view. Or that writing is a perfect, invariable thing. However, it was reasonable to consider my shortage of knowledge on the subject. I put the piece aside, waiting for a nugget of information to fill in any apparent ignorance on the subject, but very little in the way of “truth” brandished itself. This is the hard thing about writing “true” things. They are temporary and fleeting. And subject to change at any second. On the other hand, there are some “truths,” that become common knowledge – Lebanon is full of racists; Lebanon is the most “liberal” country in the Arab world. For example. These particular “truths” imply we have work to do. Noam Chomsky was in Beirut this week, and he emphasized the work we – Lebanese, Americans, Israelis – have to do. During the open question-answer session after his talk, EVERY person who stepped to the podium attacked him. For example, he was contextualizing his talk (which had no title or direction, really) by going through the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict starting with 1967. So, the first questioner leaned over the podium into the microphone and asked: “You started recounting the history of Palestine-Israel with 1967. What about 1948?” Assumingly implying that Chomsky perhaps was not only remiss but purposeful in excluding the year of the creation of the state of Israel. This man, the owner of a popular leftist café in Hamra, got a spray of applause from the audience. Chomsky replied to this and the other defensive questions/attacks with even answers and an equally defensive classification of these comments as “feel-good seminar talk”; that is, he explained, what is designed to incite emotional solidarity, but very little in the way of progress – very little outside the walls of the seminar room. In other words, his worldview is a practical one – work with what we have rather than idealistic dreams that are virtually impossible or involve mass destruction. You can guess what this implies. He echoed this sentiment in a grilling interview he had with an Israeli journalist, who pointed out his Jewish heritage and connection with Israel. He admitted that he had a fond love for Israel, but that in the past few years it had harmed itself too much, and thereby harmed those who stand/stood by it, leaving him in animosity towards the state. What has happened here now? I needed to tell you that I was feeling uncomfortable writing about Beirut. Mainly because of the nature of this blog – that it focuses on our dizzying disposition as a city, as a country at a time where we are viewing ourselves, products of thousands of years of civilization, through Prada glasses – the negative is often highlighted. And I don’t want to be negative, but it’s impossible to avoid. I just want to contribute to revolutions, ones that are not cross-eyed. Ones that are not confined to a seminar room, or a computer screen, for that matter. Ones that are not simply feel-good, applause-inducing rants. They are ones that take a lot of screwing up, thinking and re-thinking, and a consciousness of what is futile and a realistic vision of what is fertile. And they require action, confidently forward, while knowing that we may be wrong along the way and accepting that. Most importantly, let’s respond to what we believe are lies and misconceptions and injustice not with defensiveness, but rather an intention to “Join the World,” as Chomsky urged the U.S. to do – so that we may communicate, and be taken seriously, by the rest of the world. And so here I am, writing about not knowing how to write, then writing about not only Beirut, but all of us. One thing just leads to another.

People who died on his balcony

April 30th, 2010

by Maria Abou Abdallah

This poem is basically about being intrigued by, and falling in love with, someone from a completely different neighborhood of Beirut, and weighing all the societal complications and risks that come with that. Because it is so difficult and complicated, these individuals necessarily get to know each other in nooks and corners of the city, making one pay attention to beautiful things about Beirut one would otherwise not realise.

(NOTE: The title of this poem alludes to people “literally dying on a balcony…grandmothers, etc.” It actually refers to “a specific balcony that an ex-boyfriend of mine saw where apparently some people had been messing around with a Ouija board and were then haunted and chased by spirits, leading some of them to actually jump off the balcony.” We were discussing how closely the title relates to the poem, and Maria began re-thinking the title. I suggested that perhaps this poem also is about her, at 19 years old, dying on this balcony as well – being pushed past nineteen, growing up. Anyway, the title stayed, and it seems fitting.)

_________________

Lui, he sits across from

me with a local beer btirfa3 el

ras. My head rests

against the graffiti

of three-minute

testimonies, the only wall

I have against the slow intrigue

Of choice at nineteen.

My pupils dilate,

fixate on the shadows

those eyelashes cast on those

cheekbones, and the past

is brought back in candor

conversation. It is here

to make its presence known

in swirls of deeply inhaled and

relinquished cigarette smoke.

His pupils dilate, and with

focus lost and eyebrows

locked he stares,

with an unfamiliarity

reserved for looking at

orphaned children,

at a past

that made uncomfortable

the dream of coming home

to just take a nap

next to someone who

raises the dead in

you and for whom you

don’t need to tear abstractions

apart. Slamming down

years of cobwebbed cynicism and

maps of shadowed

self-handicapping nooks,

corners of comfort, I

say nothing works that way.

But then there is the

silent glare with which I

am met and I know, in that

moment, that I

will soon be taught how

to lie, how

to curl words around my

tongue and throw a

flaming cigarette at an apathetic

concrete sidewalk because this

truly hurts no

one, flaming

cigarettes that are

only accepted from

him, him and his

double-standard euphemisms.

With the extinction of

his smiles it was made

clear that upon the

materialization

of my mischief he

would stretch us to pained

blood-red-eyed insomniac

ends as proof that he

with his black stallion normalcy

crushing hoofs was always

bad enough for us both.

For a few moments under a

feeble sun, the end and its

threat are pushed up two-hundred

eroded steps that cut

between whispering

walls, cocooned from a mess of

noise and stains, stares

and acid rain, to end

up on the other

side where I say I’ve never

been as I clutch that

angle in a solid

arm that belongs to him.

Unable to yet foresee the dark

hurricanes of his unwavering

pride rooted in his

ancient inner city

pedigree, a soft,

soft hand accepts the weight of

his, the cloth before the

chloroform, and

over frozen sips of beer he

tells me of all the people who

died on his balcony, how their

veins dilated with

reason in the

heat of the dancing

flames of street

lamps and brake lights

igniting the wicks of bombs

they’d never drop, for wars

they could never win.

_________________

I met Maria at our first Wednesdays of the month open-mic poetry nights, a few years back when we held them at the Blue Note (currently held at Cafe Younes). She stood out to me because she reads her poems with conviction, a soft full voice with which she pleasantly manifests their melodies. And though she talks about accentuating beauty in her poems, do not mistaken her for a sunny writer, as her poems are often marked with the dark – which I’m often attracted to. Now that she’s in Melbourne studying social psychology, we only see her when she pops in to Lebanon, where she spent most of her life, and swings by to read us a poem from her reservoir. I asked her why she writes; maybe it’s an easy question, but I think not often an easy answer.

Many photographers say that they take photos to preserve snippets of time, to preserve the images and impressions that come with them. I write to bring attention to the mundane as there’s a lot of beauty in the world but we keep expecting glorious things to fall out of the sky with magnificient light so that we consider them to be beautiful. As cliche as it sounds, there is also beauty in sadness and in pain, in day-to-day bravery, in emotions both complex and simple, not just in great loves with music swelling in the background and William Blake’s pastures (although love is a common theme for my writing, of course). I try to be fair to the world and life…it’s not all good, it’s not all bad either.

So I write to preserve moments, impressions, smells, details, thoughts, feelings, associations between all of these things, encounters…mine and other people’s…and I try to write so that, for example in the case of this poem, people are transported to these moments, and are able to smell, see, hear, taste, think, and feel them. I also write about the antithesis of most Hollywood movies: loose ends. I write so that time is slowed down in a poem and because maybe there is poetry in the little things…even spilling a porcelain cup of coffee and watching it cracking on the floor…well there can be, if you want it.

Groundbreaking New Research

April 20th, 2010

Another Fool trying to tell women what to do. How will the Iranian women respond? Will we hear any of it?

This woman has a… reply… for that mofo.

If you had trouble understanding the woman on the video, for clarification please see the following script which she attached to her video.

at the end-speak out openly.

now you hav eproves that iran gov, persecute my quake read mad from it- an dfabricating scaringly -the just sport anyalysis-what I possess good-

but iran firmly middle age mistifying it obviously accuse me in woodoo-an drelating it direct to iran protests(and other one)

they make so impossibl epersecution of this my capabiliti mobilizing authorities and population ag me – on russian terr as if we are in iran

direct increasing heir elementary uneducating.

they say at last the news- thye stak eon me cause quakes but not read them

o-la-la-

this si too much even for my religuious feel-

while by energetical laws under such level of unjustic ewhat i feel an dconnection with informational flows it even could b e- concrete to say

it must be-

becuase justice must exist

but it does not.

owr body and face and move are holy subject what islam can nto understand-

and its beauty an dalso old age is holy-

whta budhists understand but mosnel want to kill murder abiolish.

if allah says beuty nust not exits -stop existance of allahk.

2.

we are on west-russia territory.

we ar enot moslem.

I express protest to kremlin gov. which allow such middle age obscurantism in serious manner of state mass persecution-

from mass seige abuse insults;

isolation from computing for i will nto get confirmtaion-

up to

arrests,psychiatry,

rape efforts ect/.

3.

iran contradits itself -

if me is posychiatry how they try to reprersent me-

then me is not wodoo on such impossibnb;le level who cna cuase quakes.

we pray to god abotu justiuce duirgn this moment

and maybe

HE

issued the justice in quakes bec of this.

if otehr =just sport explanation iran doe snto undertsand.

4. to usa.

plseas think seriously,what kind of counterpart you have

and what you hsould do for to stop it.

5. please,defend me from this middel age reprisal.

6/and 1st-

we pray to god an dhe listen to us.and you.

I Pity the Fool

April 15th, 2010

Can’t a chocolate bar just be a chocolate bar?

Wouldn’t it look delicious simply cracked open, all gooey, just like they make big macs and whoppers look? We won’t be mad if it doesn’t really look that way. It’ll still taste good. Or, maybe a little kid could be biting into one as he’s running around the playground, and we could have a quick flashback to when we were fresh, innocent people. We’d remember how a chocolate bar was our worst vice and how it stuck to the corners of our mouth, saved for later. Or, we could even go back to the good ol’ days when Mr. T or Michael Jordan were eating one – at least they were famous for their unique talents, even if one of those talents is being one the  strangest people  on the planet.

Snickers, Mars, Crunch, 5th Avenue, 3 Musketeers, Almond Joy, Baby Ruth, and Galaxy! These names either speak for the quality of the bar or where the bar may take you or its inspiration. These names have power, charm, substance.

FLAKE. Doesn’t sound like a trustworthy candy bar. Nor does it look like it. For, if it must be  phallic-shaped, must it seductively graze the loose mouth of a woman who appears to be in a “moment” of ecstasy? And must this name be associated as well with this woman-next-door (though not in Lebanon, maybe somewhere in Connecticut)? In other words, could Mr. T be on this billboard, next to the name “Flake”? And if a man didn’t come up with the tag line “Your Moment… Your Chocolate” (read: “It’s all yours baby”), then we can be certain that women can hardly recognize their own faces. Whether this is a Lebanese ad or not, it is at almost every corner. It is only one of the many billboards that polka-dot Beirut, displaying the faces of non-Lebanese women, only second to their jean-butts or push-up bra boobs or loose jaw. The distance between us women on the ground and those dotting our sky is becoming shorter and shorter. And once we stop thinking and speaking up for ourselves, we’ll be friendly next-door neighbors.

I pity the fools who are so narrow-minded that their creativity and line of sight halts at an erection. And, mostly, I pity the fools who cater to that.

True Story on Modern Day Beauty

April 3rd, 2010

 Recently, a Beiruti woman took her son to the emergency room because he suffered a fall and broke his arm. While she was in the hospital, she thought it would be a convenient time to inquire about the possibilities of a special surgery on her feet.

“Sorrrry, bas I have a big problem. My husband spent $3000 on Minolo Blahniks for me – he brought them all the way from New York. Bas, ya3nni, they’re toooo tight, and my feet mish hilween in them. Combien to remove my pinky toes?”

Instead of sending her to a surgeon, they referred her to a psychiatrist.

The goddess Taweret at least will look down on her with a smile.